MA177--What Fermat says
Here is a compilation of the assertions made by Fermat about
numbers. Almost all of them come from the texts you read last week, but I
couldn't resist adding a couple.
Some natural questions to ask about each of these assertions are:
  -  Where did Fermat find this?
  
 -  Is it true?
  
 -  Can I prove it's true? (or false?) 
  
 -  Why is this an interesting question?
 
As you can see from Pascal's letter, not everyone thought these were
interesting questions!
  -  The number  
  is always a prime
       number.
   -  Every number is the sum of at most three triangular numbers.
       
  Note: if we declare that 0 is a triangular (square, pentagonal,
    ...) then we can drop the ``at most'' from all these assertions.
    People in Fermat's time were still a little suspicious of 0 as a
    number.
  
 -  Every number is the sum of at most four squares.
  
 -  Every number is the sum of at most five pentagonal numbers.
  
 -  Etc.
  
 -  A prime number of the form p=4k+1 (one more than a
       multiple of four) can be obtained as the sum of two squares, i.e.,
       
, where u and v are whole numbers.
  
 -  A prime number of the form p=3k+1 can be expressed as
       
, where u and v are whole numbers.
  
 -  A prime number which is either of the form p=8k+1 or
       p=8k+3 can be expressed as  
,
       where u and v are whole numbers.
  
 -  A right triangle whose sides have whole number lengths cannot have
       area equal to a square. (For example, if the triangle has sides
       equal to 3, 4, and 5 units then its area is 6, which isn't a square.
  
 -  Fix a prime number p, and consider the sequence of powers of 2: 
       
       
 
 
       Then:
       
  
    -  There is always a smallest exponent n such that  
  is a multiple of p.
    
 -  This n is always a divisor of p-1.
    
 -  If m is any other exponent such that  
  is a multiple of p, then m is
	 a multiple of n. 
  
 
  
   -  The statements above remain true when we replace 2 with any other
       number that is not divisible by our prime number p.
  
 -  Given any number N that is not a square, there exist infinitely
       many pairs of whole numbers x and y such that  
.
  
 -  In the previous problem, there exists an explicit ``mechanical''
       procedure for finding all the solutions x and y.
  
 -  No cube can be written as a sum of two cubes.
  
 -  No fourth power can be written as a sum of two fourth powers.
  
 -  In general, if n is bigger than 2, no n-th power can
       be written as the sum of two n-th powers.
 
Fernando Q. Gouvea 
Fri Nov 21 13:32:48 EST 1997