Topic Area: Bicycles as Transportation Policy
Geographic Area: Japan
Focal Question: Can bicycles become a viable form of
transportation?
Sources:
Replogle, Michael. 1992. ÒBicycle Access to Public
Transportation: Learning from Abroad.Ó ITE Journal.
(Dec) 15-21
Replogle, Michael. 1992b. ÒBicycle and Pedestrian Policies and
Programs in Asia, Australia and New Zealand.Ó Federal Highway
Administration, Case Study 17. Publication No. FHWA-PD-92-016
Allen , Phillip. 1994. ÒGetting Back to Biking.Ó
Geographical Magazine 66(Jun) 46-8 Lowe, Marcia D. 1989. The
Bicycle: Vehicle for a Small Planet . WorldWatch Institute Paper
90.
Note: Unless otherwise noted, data is from Replogle 1992b.
Reviewer: Rush Hambleton, Colby College Ô97
Review:
Through necessity, Japan has adopted the bicycle as a essential
component of transportation. The island nationÕs limited
geography, high density and lack of petroleum makes it an ideal
location for small, efficient bicycles. The destruction of
JapanÕs infrastructure during the second world war forced
citizens to employ non-motorized means of transportation until the
nationÕs high speed railways were developed in the
1950Õs. With renewed infrastructure in place, the Japanese
were quick to reject bicycling and its post-war reconstruction
connotations and took to riding collector busses to and from railway
stations. The bus system began to be overburdened in the late
1960Õs and riders began to find the system slow, expensive and
inconvenient.
The disincentives of bus travel and surging environmental concerns
associated with motorized travel initiated a shift in public opinion
in favor of bicycling and bike ownership began to grow at 10%
annually . Bicycles inundated railway stations and caused a bike
pollution problem, inciting the Ministry of Transportation and
Ministry of Construction to take action and build 22,000 bicycle
parking spaces in 1973. Japanese bike ownership doubled between 1975
and 1977, demanding additional construction projects in 1978.
The Japanese government recognized that bike travel was favorable to
other modes of transport for many reasons. Biking requires no
petroleum and cyclists consume only 32 calories per mile compared to
automobilesÕ 1,800 cal/mi demand. CyclistsÕ respiration
contribute a scant 2 grams of carbon dioxide per passenger mile,
while single-occupancy automobile emits 85 CO2 grams per mile (Lowe
1989). On the road, eight cyclists can occupy the space needed for
one automobile and when stopped, twenty bikes can be parked where
there is space for just one automobile (Allen 1994). These advantages
prompted the government to consider other ways to promote bike travel
including considerable urban design changes and the addition of
37,000 miles of bike/pedestrian pathways during the 1970Õs.
From an energy, pollution and density standpoint, the bicycle is more
efficient than any other mode of short-trip travel. Because commuters
are reluctant to pedal more than about four miles, railway stations
are located near residential areas so that commuters will be willing
to pedal to the nearest train stop; innovations in high-density
bicycle parking offers travelers in the busiest stations safe,
fully-automated mechanical storage facilities. Construction of the
most expensive facilities cost $2,000 per bike, compared to $4,000 to
$18,000 for a single automobile parking space in the United States
(Replogle 1992). Japanese investments in bicycle infrastructure are
offset by savings in subsidized bus systems as bicycle growth has
surpassed bus ridership growth; at some railway stations, more than
50% of commuters arrive by bike.
The Ministry of Transportation has developed an elaborate bike rental
system coordinated with the rail systems. Japanese travelers purchase
a card granting them unlimited bike rental for a month; this allows
people to ride a bike to the station near their home, surrender it
there and take another from the station nearest their workplace. The
identical, lime-green bikes have a built in lock, bell, light and
basket for parcels; their uniformity enables extremely high density
storage.
|
|||
Year |
Commuting |
Personal Activity |
Business Travel |
1968 |
25.8 |
69 |
25.8 |
1978 |
23.1 |
62.3 |
19.8 |
1988 |
21.7 |
57.9 |
16.8 |
In order for bicycles to be accepted as a mode of transportation,
the atmosphere for cycling must be appropriate. The Japanese have
effectively discouraged automobile use with high ownership costs; in
the capital city of Tokyo, automobile registration averages $1,000 a
year; parking fines can be as high as $1,500; gasoline costs 3.1
times the U.S. rate and tolls on a sixty-mile trip can cost $60.
These costs reflect unsubsidized automobile use (as opposed to the
U.S.Õs highly subsidized system) and JapanÕs historic
aversion to resource-consuming, pollution-emitting vehicles.
Urban planning encourages bicycle use by adopting traffic calming
techniques to intentionally slow down and discourage automobile use.
The community street method involves turning straight streets into
meandering, narrow passageways dotted with trees and Òvest
pocket parksÓ. Intersections may have irregular surfaces or
large humps or even have Òdiagonal divertersÓ to
Òprevent easy passageÓ (quoted from Japanese urban
planning guides). These arrangements in residential and commercial
areas have garnered 90% approval ratings from citizens. Automobile
traffic slowed to 5 to 7 mph and reduced by 40%, and bicycle traffic
increased by 54% in front of their homes and businesses when
community streets are used in favor of traditional roads. More severe
are the traffic cells, which prohibit personal automobiles near city
centers, reducing traffic death rates by 58%, and cutting
automobile-related pollutants by 16%.
The consequences of the bicycle-intensive transportation system in
Japan is favorable. Over 80% of Japanese households own at least one
bike, and the national average is 1.42 bike per household. High
non-motorized mode share has lowered Japanese per capita fuel
consumption to 10% of AmericansÕ.
The future is not as encouraging as the past. Overall bicycle mode
share is falling. Rising incomes threatens bicycle usage as Japanese
commuters are increasingly able to afford expensive automobiles.
Despite their previous expenditures, the Japanese government seems
uncommitted to future expansion of bicycling infrastructure and they
are likely to enhance their nationÕs automobile infrastructure
if possible (Replogle, 1997). It seems that their history of
sustainable transportation may have been only a temporary measure,
forestalling their current move to energy-depleting and
pollution-causing mechanized transportation.